I also criticized them for profiting off of what they consider “dangerous” products. I find it encouraging that they have fixed anything. But they still list Polyparaben as a synonym for Propylparaben but that is a minor mistake. They used to have a listing for a fictional compound POLYPARABEN. They have fixed at least one flaw that I pointed out in a previous blog post 3 reasons why the ( EWG is a dubious source). ![]() ![]() The EWG gets a lot of criticism for flaws in their database, but I have to give them credit where credit is due.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |